Talk:Duedil

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 82.6.206.5 in topic This article reads suspiciously

This article reads suspiciously

edit

Does anybody else feel like someone working for Duedil wrote this? BFKelleher (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes - agree totally. Feels like a company info page written by the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.206.5 (talk) 12:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Duedil has been written about in some of the world's biggest publications, including:

The New York Times

The Telegraph

Gigaom

TechCrunch

It also won Techcrunch's best startup at GeeknRolla. — Thomro (talk) 16:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Duedil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply