Talk:Duke Blue Devils men's basketball

Image copyright problem with Image:Duke Blue Devils logo.svg

The image Image:Duke Blue Devils logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

RFC discussion on logo usage on this page

There is a Request for Comment occurring about whether certain college-sports related pages should include a logo. This is an article that would be affected by the decision. You are invited to participate in the discussion if you wish. permalink to discussion as of this point in time. --Bobak (talk) 21:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Inclusion of sentence regarding Kentucky "getting revenge" on Duke

There is no reason to include a sentence about Kentucky "getting revenge" in a section about the accomplishments of Duke during Mike Krzyzewski's tenure as head coach. This article is about Duke, and that section is about Duke's accomplishment's, not Kentucky's. Inclusion of such a sentence is inappropriate editorializing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.245.121 (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was Keep. Merge proposed 13 June 2008. Nearly a year later, only two responses, but there is clearly a consensus (see Izzone, Orange Krush for other examples) -- Bluedog423^Talk 20:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

---

Cameron Crazies should be a separate article. There is even a template for student sections for some conferences (The Big Ten has one, but I don't know about ACC).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The Crazies definitely deserve their own section. They are only the most infamous student section in college sports. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.3.1.215 (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit request from 71.111.217.182, 30 January 2011

{{edit semi-protected}}

first line reads

The Duke Blue Devils men's basketball team is the college basketball program representing Duke University and one of the premier flopping teams in the nation.

should read

The Duke Blue Devils men's basketball team is the college basketball program representing Duke University and one of the premier teams in the nation.

- - - - The first line of this article calls Duke one of the premier FLOPPING team in America. The BOLD word is clearly a derogatory insertion, it's pretty obvious one of your "approved" users abused their privileges.

thanks --rob wildermann I can be reached at rwildermann@gmail.com

71.111.217.182 (talk) 01:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Already done Actually, it was done by an anonymous editor, as the article was temporarily unprotected. In any event, it was just plain vandalism that was already removed

Record Dispute

When Coach K was out in the 90s with back problems, Duke lost to UNC, I believe, once. UNC considers that loss apart of K's record while Duke does not. Section? UoMfan98 (talk) 22:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

not a part of coach k's record  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.90.175.195 (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 

The yearly record section should be modified to indicate that Jeff Capel was head coach for part of 2016-2017 season. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:4501:E18C:5D4F:5AFC:93A6:E199 (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Blastin Boners

Probably shouldn't be there, but glad it is. Jstohler (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Damaged page

Some guy changed this page (hilariously i must admit) but i figured id report the issue Hsmitty435 (talk) 04:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Duke Blue Devils men's basketball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060411194046/http://www.ncaa.org/library/records/basketball/m_basketball_records_book/2006/2006_m_basketball_records.pdf to http://www.ncaa.org/library/records/basketball/m_basketball_records_book/2006/2006_m_basketball_records.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090210102130/http://www.dukeblueplanet.com:80/blog.asp?bid=18&pid=206 to http://www.dukeblueplanet.com/blog.asp?bid=18&pid=206
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071028093033/http://msn.foxsports.com:80/olympics/story/5796002 to http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/story/5796002
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.columbiaspectator.com/node/21802/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Teams pages

This article lacks links to yearly/seasonal team pages (e.g., 1992 Duke Blue Devils) outside of the current year. Please supply information for each team page.72.174.131.123 (talk) 23:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

There is links to every available team season in the season-by-season chart, even more than a few others linked in the article itself. Brian (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice of move discussion

Hi all, I have started a move discussion to change the names of the articles for the first 19 seasons of Duke Blue Devils men's basketball. The discussion can be found at Talk:1905–06 Duke Blue Devils men's basketball team#Requested move 17 August 2022 (please discuss the moves there, and not here). Cheers, IagoQnsi (talk) 23:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Mike Gminski Duke.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Mike Gminski Duke.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Jalen Johnson as a "Duke star?"

Anyone else have a problem with Jalen Johnson being listed as a "former Duke star to play in the NBA"?

I would argue that he wasn't a "star"at Duke and that quitting the team mid-season is grounds for disqualification as a "Duke" star.

According to GoDuke.com, Johnson played in 13 games, started 8 and averaged 11.2 points on .523 field goal shooting, 6.1 rebounds and 2.2 assists per game. Not exactly "star" stats.

I have no problem acknowledging that Johnson played at Duke for 13 games and showed promise. But I vote that he should be deleted from this particular list of "former Duke star to play in the NBA."

What do you think? Kangaroos22 (talk) 18:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)