Talk:Duke of Gloucester

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

Gloucestershire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baron Culloden

I have always wondered about this subsidiary title. Is it really a reference to the Battle of Culloden? Does that seem like terrible PR to anybody else? Surely anything which reminds Jacobite sympathizers or patriotic highlanders of that battle can only serve to make for awkwardness; you'd think that they'd have tried to put it behind them! Or can there be some other reason why Culloden, Scotland merits use as a subsidary title? Doops 20:04, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Line of Succesion

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Doesn't the Duke of Kent and his descendents follow in the line of succession of this dukedom? The Prince George, 1st Duke Duke of Kent was the younger brother of The Prince Henry, 1st Duke of Gloucester, I think they follow on the line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.203.192.134 (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duke of Gloucester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080319081431/http://www.ukdukes.co.uk:80/the_dukes/the_duke_of_gloucester/ to http://www.ukdukes.co.uk/the_dukes/the_duke_of_gloucester/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Query

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I wonder what is involved with this dukedom, beyond the title itself. Are any properties or customs connected to it? Or are all of the dukes of this line expected to provide their own income independent of both the civil list & any royal estates? (I know I'm confused in my terminology, but I'm groping after an answer deep in ignorance.) -- llywrch (talk) 09:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic