This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
The dukes of Teck date back much earlier than cited in the article (see de:Herzöge von Teck). Descendants of the Zähringen family called themselves dukes of Teck first time in 1187. The title was passed on to the dukes of Württemberg in 1495. --Pischdi 16:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've edited the Wurttemburg cadet branch section here; it was pretty huffy about the dukes renunciation of his German title (it made no difference whatsoever... etc) so I've trimmed it for length and tone.
But the question remains (as it isn't sourced at all); if the duke renounced his title, was he still recognized as such in Germany? In Britain all titles of nobility are the gift of the crown and can be withdrawn, previously under an Act of Attainder, but latterly (when attainder was abolished in the C19th) by the Titles Deprivation Act. Are we saying that the King of Wurttemburg, or even the Kaiser, did not have the power to do the same? The Weimar government certainly did, and the Kaiser managed to abdicate without anyone saying he couldn't. Or were the Germans reserving the right to try the Cambridge's as traitors? Anybody know? Swanny18 (talk) 10:36, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
