Talk:Duloch

Duloch is neither large enough nor significant to the town of Dunfermline's history to merit an individual article. This should be merged with Dunfermline.--Epocalypse2 14:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Added a merge tag in line with your suggestion. Edward Waverley 16:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

That is a personal opinion, as you said, 'Duloch is not significant to the town of Dunfermline's history', ergo it should not be merged with it and will continue to have a seperate page.

The fact Duloch Park is not significant enough for its own article is a tad on the ridicules side. Dulch Park is not only half the size of the town but currently the largest residential expansion project in Europe! The area is attracting many residents from Edinburgh with its 1st class housing and reasonable prices compared to those of the capital, not to mention easy access to the motorway which means they can move in and still get to work. This is exciting because it means higher earners are spending more money in the town centre thus helping to revitalise the area as a whole. I not only believe Duloch Park is important for the towns economy but a giant step towards the less fortunate areas of Dunfermline receiving over due upgrades and therefore up lifting the spirits of the local community giving them a renewed sense of self-worth. My final point on the "significance" matter is as follows Duloch may not be a huge part of Dunfermline’s history yet but in years to come will have a solid claim to the responsibility of colour being reintroduced to the The Auld Grey Toun

I found the information about Dulochs history very interesting and would appreciate more being added if possible. I would however like to make one request can the article be changed to read along the lines of the City and Royal Burgh of Dunfermline rather than a dormitory suburb of Edinburgh? Although Ill agree the comment isn’t wrong I believe the town being a city should be recognised as such and not made to sound so insignificant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CannonJnr (talk • contribs) 18:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duloch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120220010517/http://www.fifedirect.org.uk/topics/index.cfm?fuseaction=advice.display&subjectid=F0F739ED-508B-DE79-47D3A6D0F83A12CD&adviceid=4BF34F5D-98C5-42C1-45ADA7252AFEECDA to http://www.fifedirect.org.uk/topics/index.cfm?fuseaction=advice.display&subjectid=F0F739ED-508B-DE79-47D3A6D0F83A12CD&adviceid=4BF34F5D-98C5-42C1-45ADA7252AFEECDA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)