Kirk Hammett

edit

Hammett never used to play with a dumble amplifier, he always used to play with mesa boogie amplifiers, mark IV, double and triple rectifier and mark I. So I deleted his name from the list of Dumble players. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.50.43.44 (talk) 14:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removal of Pictures

edit

Can someone help the listing by posting their photos of an ODS 50W combo to replace the deleted photo, which lacked correct copyright attribution, and possibly a photo of a Dumble Winterland - although I have only ever seen the one picture that was originally posted here.

Considering it isn't stated that this amp is necessarily superior to others, and normal people can't really buy this amp anyway, I don't see how this is NPOV. 24.76.183.115 00:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Totally agree, the value of these amps comes from their rareness. In so far they are like a painting of a famous artist. Also they are not really for sale. No advertisment in my opinion...

Mr. Dumble

edit

I've known Mr. Dumble for over twenty years. He hasn't lived in Santa Cruz since the early 1970's.

edited the page

edit

Removed un-important list,errors and simplified the text.82.215.206.19 07:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Picture of "Carlos Santana"

edit

That's not Carlos Santana, it's Neal Schon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakehop (talkcontribs) 16:47, 23 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


edit

As Dumble doesn't sell any amplifiers at retail and only by referral, this cannot be construed as an advrtisement.--Benfeing (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Gods of Toan"???

edit

Whoever edited the "Steel String Singer" and "150W Overdrive Special" sections, I want to say thank you for providing information that has nothing to do with this article. Quite frankly, one line is offensive to Mr. Dumble: "He spent a night in jail, but was released because he was "...too fat to keep in custody", says a Santa Cruz DA." Can someone do something about this genius?

Uhhh

edit

"Part of the characteristic sound of Dumble amplifiers comes from Dumble's choice of parts:"

Not the kind of assertion you should throw around lightly; a highly controversial topic by all accounts.

188.223.19.6 (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Another Dumble User

edit

I have a friend who is a professional photographer and back in the 80's he took pictures of Tom Verlaine at a solo concert. Some of the photos revealed that he was using an Overdrive Special. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GatesofDawn67 (talkcontribs) 17:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dumble Amplifiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

"... resembles that of the old hi fidelity "James" circuits"

edit

No idea what this means. Explain, please. PaulCHebert (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dumble Amplifiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

"$200,000 Dumble amp...made for Merle Haggard" isn't quite that

edit

The final sentence of the first paragraph in the lede states "Other examples have sold for more [than $150,000]." The link to the source for this claim is malformed and leads nowhere. I searched for the original claim and found the video in question on Facebook ( https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10154783790461057&ref=sharing ) but it does not support the claim, it simply states "150 watt Dumble amp specifically made for Merle Haggard! $200,000!!!" with no source for this claim. Obviously a Facebook video does not qualify as a reliable source. Next I searched textually and found the amplifier in question, listed for sale on Reverb.com for $155,000. However, that amplifier is not listed as "specifically made for Merle Haggard", as the Facebook video claimed, but rather "rumored to have been originally built for Merle Haggard"; a significantly less definitive claim. Also, the listing says "Looks like someone already grabbed this gear!", which does not mean that it actually sold (it would say the same if the seller had accepted a lower offer, or if it had been withdrawn), but in either case, it does not support the claim that this amplifier "sold for more (than $150,000). Unless someone can furnish a source to show that this amplifier sold for more than $150,000, the claim should be removed. Bricology (talk) 22:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply