Talk:Duncanrig Secondary School

Latest comment: 13 years ago by ColinCameron in topic It is not high school it is secondary school

to Laridum it seems you need some authorisation to add a picture see the help pages good idea though Remcee (talk) 10:50, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

tagged article

edit

hi, is there beginning to be enough references and citations in this article appreciate any help and/or opinion Remcee (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

the article is about the building designed by Basil Spence not about the eductional institution which now calls itself Duncanrig High School. He designed for Duncanrig Secondary School, hence that should be the title. If their is some agreement I will change the title back to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Remcee (talkcontribs) 11:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tags

edit

Much of this article is actually about issues more generally related to government policy and the procurement system for the construction of new schools, rather than to the school in question. It also contains a series of value judgements and personal observations that are inappropriate in the context. This is an encyclopaedia, not Private Eye. Moreover, it badly written in a conversational tone. Major clean-up required.86.1.196.156 (talk) 00:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Further to the deletion of all contentious material, I have added a small note on the new school building. Hopefully this can be expanded without drifting back to what it was. ColinCameron (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is not high school it is secondary school

edit

The school is NOT called Duncarig High School it is called Duncarig Secondary School. Gr1873 (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The school has never been named Duncanrig High School, so I am changing the title to reflect this. Any issues, please make them known here before changing back. ColinCameron (talk) 11:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Refrences

edit

The reference list for this page needs some attention. Does anyone want to try to rationalise it? ColinCameron (talk) 11:26, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply