Talk:Duocentric social network

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Duocentric social network article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

Duocentric social network was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 29, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

GA Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Duocentric social network/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 05:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, this article is quick fail eligible due to containing unsourced information which may be original research. Also, the nominator has not been active since last year. The article may be nominated again if all information has a clear source and the nominator has ascertained that no original research is employed. b uidhe 05:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic