Talk:Dust Breeding

I don't want to get into an edit war over here, so let's see if I can address some of your concerns:

1. The significant parts of the story being in the lead. Yes, in general I agree with that, but the most significant part of this story and the big reveal is that Mr Seta is the Master, so to have a spoiler tag right in the lead seems a bit weird. If we want to preserve the spoiler, at least hang it down lower.
2. The Seventh Doctor not being mentioned - but he is, in the plot section. If you look at the other episodic articles, we have it there as well. I've actually been toying with the idea of doing an infobox for the CDs like the television stories... perhaps that might be a solution.
3. I don't think the plot section need to go "The plot concerns..." That is self-apparent from the section itself.

Cheers. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 04:28, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

I've seen plenty of articles with a spoiler warning in the lead, and I do think the Caroline John return is also lead-worthy. Phil Sandifer 04:42, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree that John's return is noteworthy - that's why I left it up there. How about if we put the spoiler warning in the lead, mention the Master's return, but save the details about Mr Seta and the emaciated state to the notes? --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 04:46, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Works for me. And on that note, good night. :) Phil Sandifer 04:49, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Quality Assessment

Start Class:

• The article contains a useful picture or graphic
• There are multiple links to websites with more info on the topic
• There is one subheading which fully treats an element of the topic - the cast section and a useful info box

Importance Scale:

Mid - While the story is notable within Doctor Who field it is unknown outside of this--Amxitsa (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)