Talk:Dutch West India Company

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2603:8000:6900:D380:5C99:4230:2086:A17C in topic Product : Slaves

Untitled

edit

Content from misspelled duplicate article:

The Dutch West India Company was a fun, long-lived Dutch company engaged in colonization of Africa and the New World from 1621 until its charter expired in 1791. Among many other settlements and colonies, in the 1620's the company built Fort Amsterdam on Manhattan, Fort Orange near Albany, N.Y., Fort Good Hope on the Connecticut river near Hartford, Connecticut, and Fort Nassau on the Delaware river. After losing New Netherlands to England, the company reorganized as an African slave trading company.


This text, added by 68.51.141.251, was put here instead of the current first three paragraphs. I removed it, since the original text should not be gone, butt I'm not sure what to do with this.

English, who conquered New Netherland in 1664, and in part due to the difficulty of attracting settlers under the company's initial policy of the Patroon system, which granted vast power over settlers to the men who brought them to the colony.


"Fun"? Monomoit (talk) 14:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article mentions the VOC, I assume this refers to the Dutch East India Company. There used to be a VOC flag among those in a display in the courtyard of the City Hall in Philadelphia. This probably was a mistake, since the article to the fort established by the GWC at a site on the other side of the Delaware River, in New Jersey. Was a distinctive flag ever used by the GWC? Monomoit (talk) 14:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Piracy

edit

In the opening paragraph it reads:

Another success for the WIC was the capture of a fleet carrying silver from the Spanish colonies to Europe by Piet Hein in 1628 - piracy was one of the objectives of the WIC.

I don't know wether that last statement is true, but to call this capture of silver piracy seems strange, since The Netherlands were at war with Spain at the time. I removed the statement. 82.171.216.246 10:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The correct term is of course "privateering".--MWAK 18:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Abbrevation

edit

It's actually WIC, not GWC or GWIC, and since you're basing the abbrevation on the Dutch word, I'd suggest taking the Dutch abbrevation.--82.95.139.103 (talk) 14:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Translation from Dutch Wikipedia

edit

I translated the Dutch article (nl:West-Indische Compagnie) on request. Please leave a message if you encounter problems, inconsistencies or bad English. J.D. Hooijberg (talk) 21:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I did not translate the section on slave trade. Because it is a quite controversial history, I think this subject needs attention, or a seperate article about Dutch Slave Trade. The reason I've decided not to translated it, is because the original Dutch version lacks inline citations (although a lot reccomended reading is available), and I don't have expertise on this subject. I hope someone else will pick up this subject in the future, in one way or another.J.D. Hooijberg (talk) 23:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The last sentences in the section on Decline are very confusing:

"The first West India Company conducted a long agony, and its end in 1674 was painless. The reason that the WIC could drag on for twenty years was due to its valuable West African possessions.",

The first sentence makes no sense. What does "conducted a long agony" mean? Should it be "suffered a long agony", or maybe "caused a lot of agony"? And why was its end in 1674 painless? There is no information explaining the end of the first GWC.
178.85.92.198 (talk) 12:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dutch West India Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Slavery

edit

The GWC played a major role in Slavery, there should be a separate section dealing with this rather than mentioning it in passing in various other sections. For example the GWC built and owned the Elmina Castle in Ghana which was a major collection point for slaves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardKre (talkcontribs) 13:17, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Product : Slaves

edit

They had a lot more than slaves for sale… 2603:8000:6900:D380:5C99:4230:2086:A17C (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply