Talk:Dynamic covalent chemistry

[untitled]

this article makes little sense. it does not say what the dcc is about. it mentiones some strategy, doesnt say what is the purpose of the strategy. does not say what this is all about - a completely confusing and uninformative piece of work. it is suspected that this is some obsucre part of chemistry that does not even have a widespread recognition as such!Vukasin Mandrapa

• the article provides some background into a concept in supramolecular chemistry and also provides an example. Placing question marks in the text it self is not the way to proceed in Wiki. The article is neutral: a strategy is a strategy and can be effective or not. I do not see any weasel words. Proper understanding of this article requires some knowledge of chemistry but internal links to support articles are provided. With respect to poorly written: I do not see any constructive edits in your user history so we cannot compare styles. I am removing the tags and re-edit to meet your demands to some degree. V8rik 19:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

This article is poorly written. The selected example is of little importance and should be replaced by a more significant one, for instance the seminal paper by Sanders et al. in Science, 2002, 297, 590.Lambertsci

• Consider doing a rewrite. The selected example adequately demonstrates what the concept is about. I will not enter into important/non-important debates. Why should there be only one example? If you want to add the Sanders work then simple add the Sanders work. Plenty space V8rik (talk) 23:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)