Talk:Dyssodia papposa
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Dyssodia papposa appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the plant Dyssodia papposa was given to horses for coughs by the Dakota and smoked for epilepsy by the Keres?
- Reviewed: Digital HiNote
Moved to mainspace by Asdjk48 (talk). Nominated by SL93 (talk) at 19:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC).
- Hi SL93, good work finding this article by a new user. Generally a good article but I note that the first paragraph of the "Description" section is missing a citation; the lead could also do with expanding above one sentence - Dumelow (talk) 07:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Dumelow I sourced the section and expanded the lead. SL93 (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- I will point out, just in case, that the sentence about its Greek and Latin meaning is sourced to the SW Field Guide tab on the reference. SL93 (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks SL93, I reworded the lead a little and added a few links in the article to clarify botanical terms. Article was created 20 October and exceeds minimum length; it is cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources; I didn't pick up any overly close paraphrasing in a spot check on the sources; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, AGF on offline sourcing; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 06:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)