Talk:Dzhanibek Golaev
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?Hero_id=6848. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2013081110000896. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
 | This article contains a translation of Голаев, Джанибек Нанакович from ru.wikipedia. |
The draft: to the Reviewers
editHello! I am usually a Russian Wikipedia editor and I decided to translate Russian Article ru:Голаев, Джанибек Нанакович into English language. This is translated from Russian Wikipedia and so it should be available with compliance of the Creative Commons BY-SA license.
I think the person is fairly notable to be on en-wiki. He is a hero of Russian Federation. I found the article on the list of the articles for creation (there are 300 biographic articles that should be translated from Russian).
I want to focus on copyright issues. The first one is that this article uses huge amount of text from "Герои страны" website ("Warheroes.ru"). But i think that Wikipedia got an OTRS permission to use materials from "Герои страны" by this author. Russian page ru:Википедия:Список источников, откуда разрешено копирование says that the OTRS permission was confirmed. The copyvio detector sees 14,5% on this article.
There are two websites with 6% and 4% of violation. I have removed the red-highlighted facts from the article in English. But there are some huge copyright notices which show 40 and 80% of copyvio. But I think these sites copied the article from Wikipedia, not Wikipedia editors did so. The 40% notice is a news website and it says that date of creation is 23.02.2017, but the Russian Article was created much earlier. Also there is a 80% copyright notice. This is a school website. The school's article is dedicated to people who fought on the Great Patriotic War. The big title says "2015 год" (year 2015) and it's most likely that it was created nearly in May, 2015 or earlier. But Russian article already existed in 2015 and in 2014. But... this isn't a date actually, it's a title, not the date. Howerer I couldn't find proofs that this website existed in these old days. Is this a copyvio from Wikipedia or to Wikipedia?
Thanks for review and excuse me for a such long post. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 10:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- It is fairly common for Russian websites to copy Wikipedia without attribution.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)