Talk:E'Twaun Moore/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   There is a lack of consistency with piped wikilinks to teams (sometimes the college, sometimes the team name and once a nickname) but that may help the quality of the prose by making it more readable.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   I cannot check some of the references (newspaper archives asking for username) but in general all sources appear to be good.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: