Talk:E-gold/Archives/2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 172.58.99.221 in topic Financial Cryptography sources


Neutrality

This reads like an apologia, there's excuses all through and "but banks are bad too!" Needs a cleanup - David Gerard (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Financial Cryptography sources

I think this might be original research, but it seems clear to me that these two Financial Cryptography sources have been proven wrong:

  • "FC++: Bitcoin & Gresham's Law - the economic inevitability of Collapse". Financial Cryptography. 2012-02-23. Retrieved 2013-09-20.
  • Exchanges were regulated an legitimized, and you can trade person-to-person without any centralized exchange. Botnets became irrelevant when FPGAs (and later ASICs) dominated the mining market.
  • Although it continues to have bubbles, it's tending to stabilize overall. Theft has since been vastly reduced with multisignature transactions and hardware wallets (like the Trezor).

--104.129.198.101 (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Not only are they wrong, but that site has an angle against bitcoin. They are promoting alternative currency systems. Typical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.99.221 (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 34 external links on E-gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)