Talk:E. R. Bills
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Notability?
editIs E. R. Bills notable? See WP:AUTHOR: "1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors."
Google Scholar shows 7 citations for "The 1910 Slocum Massacre: An Act of Genocide in East Texas" by E. R. Bill. I don't see 7 citations as being widely cited.
"2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique."
I see no evidence of the above.
"3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."
I see no evidence of the above.
"4. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums."
I see no evidence of the above.
In addition, the basic criteria for notability is:
"People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject."
I see no evidence of the above.
Could someone address some of these issues? Cxbrx (talk) 06:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Primary sources
editThis article is a dumpster fire many of the "references" are the subject talking about themselves. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)