Talk:EB Games Expo

File:EB Expo 2011 Logo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:EB Expo 2011 Logo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:EB Expo 2011 Logo.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Lol just a blank. I was AT Eb 2014 and there was alot more in Nintendo's bit. Splatoon, Hyrule Warriors, and Captain Toad Treasure Tracker. They did not have just Smash for both versions. 211.27.8.242 (talk) 10:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

Merge Proposal and Redirect. Please do not modify it.
The result of the request for the Proposed Merger of EB Games Expo 2015 and EB Games Expo 2016 into this talk page's article was:

Consensus Reached–Awaiting Merge.
— — — — —

Proposing that EB Games Expo 2015 and EB Games Expo 2016 be merged into this article.

Neither expo in their own right satisfies in my opinion the event notability guideline. Neither event has recieved significant coverage beyond the event itself, nor has either event had any lasting event. I also note that we do not have individual articles for each individual installment of PAX. -- sandgemADDICT ^yeah? 02:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Notification: @PhilipTerryGraham:. -- sandgemADDICT ^yeah? 02:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Oppose - that's because there's no incentive to split PAX (event) into numerous articles, whereas here, it's silly to be having a page full of content that would otherwise be articles. Here, the mention of these expos aren't just some 3-sentence paragraph, they're complete with exhibitors lists and text info on exhibitors, games, guests and other related events. I hate seeing articles within articles, personally. Philip Terry Graham 04:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

• These articles are not coat racks for adding floor plans and minutiae of the exposition—the year-specific articles should be split summary style from the main article and not vice versa. As it stands, I only see routine coverage that this event happened and no special cause to split it from the main series article. Remember that this is an encyclopedia. The indiscriminate collection of all the other details is outside the scope unless there is some specific notability to the 2015/6/etc. event czar 18:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
• Support a merge I see no reason not to merge these articles into one. It is unnecessary to have individual stub articles for each year. What makes each year notable in its own right? It's perfectly acceptable to have one extensive article covering each year. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 07:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

• Comment: Discussion favors merge, especially per Inappropriate content. @Sandgem Addict: or other interested party should proceed with the merge. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 23:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

— — — — —
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a WP:PM.

Please do not modify it.
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 23:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

A copy of this template can be found here.

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)