Talk:ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Censorship not necessary

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've just discovered this article after spending a bit of time today discussing matters relating to super-injunctions and unwarranted censorship of Wikipedia. See my comments at Talk:ETK and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Super-injunctions_and_unnecessary_censorship_of_Wikipedia (that one will probably disappear into the archive soon enough, but it's the thread beginning 18:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC) for those who want to find it. Basically I don't think the super-injunction is a good reason to keep ETK's name out of this article: Wikipedia is hosted in Florida. I'll let more experienced editors thrash out the WP:BLP issues or whatever it is that might apply with this particular injunction, that's not my concern here. Terminal emulator (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there could possibly be a reliable source that gives us the name, anyway. Seeing a name on a website isn't good enough for Wikipedia. St Anselm (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic