Talk:EU Ecolabel

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 13 September 2014 by reviewer SmileBlueJay97 (talk · contribs).

European Union

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Europe

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ecology

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

July 2014

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. --18 July 2014 by Dodger67 (talk).

A need of more thorough coverage

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed external links in article body and converted them to inline citations. This is consistent with readers' expectations — article body only contains wikilinks to other pages on the same site.

The draft isn't yet ready for the following reasons:

Only European Commission and EUR-Lex sources are provided. Please find and analyse more sources:
- Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
The article focuses on the article subject description from the inside, but an encyclopedia focuses — at least upfront — on a subject description from the outside (while going into more detail is acceptable further down after this goal has been pleased). Think more about press coverage, user reception, and adoption, perhaps some statistics.

Please fix them and resubmit.

If you have any questions, click 'edit' next to this section title and type your question, and it would be answered shortly.

Thank you. Gryllida (talk) 10:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good to move to main article space

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Moved from the draft page to this page. --10:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Has sufficient referencing to establish notability, good to move to main article space. Philg88 ^♦talk 08:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, and thanks to SmileBlueJay97 for the move! --Gryllida (talk) 10:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic