Talk:Eagles Guidelines
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Notability
editI am not sold on the notability of the article. A Google search didn't really sway me either. The reason I am coming here is that the Google search included the word "Eagle", which can bring up an array of results. Are there any other sources that could be incorporated? CurlyPop88 (talk) 01:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 15 May 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was proposed in this section that Eagles Guidelines be renamed and moved to Linguistic categories.
result: Links: current log • target log
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
Eagles Guidelines → Linguistic categories – Merge and move with EAGLES paragraph under Linguistic_categories#Multilingual_annotation_schemes. Reason: The article writes about EAGLES in present tense, and apparently hasn't been updated since the project finished (20 years ago). This is relevant, though, but should be presented along with other approaches on linguistic categories (many of which were influenced by EAGLES). Chiarcos (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.