Talk:Earful Tower

Move reasoning

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no move at this time - evidence is contradictory. JPG-GR (talk) 23:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

It's called the Earffel Tower in Paris, and in the US. Press article for Disney World tower calls it Earffel too, not Earful. --TIB (talk) 16:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I see no reason not to go ahead. You could probably even put this in the non controversial moves. Kopf1988 (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Wait a second... our disney world article says there are two such towers. The Earffel Tower in Paris, and the Earful Tower in Florida. Kopf1988 (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Photo proposal

I propose we use this official press photo. Source. --TIB (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

File:WDWNEWS EarfulTower.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:WDWNEWS EarfulTower.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)