Talk:Earl Haig Fund Scotland
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhen I moved to Scotland last year, the Scottish poppy was different to the English one, having four petals instead of two, and an integral pin - in my opinion, a much better design. This year, I've only seen the English-style poppy. Was the other type a one-off or was it a tradition that's just been abandoned? -88.110.219.179 11:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
During a recent house-tidy we discovered a Haig Fund Poppy with five petals and two narrow-strips of carboard as the stem. The poppy is made out of cloth and the centre piece is small disc with 'Haig'S Fund' printed on it. Any ideas as to its date? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.190.166 (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Earl Haig Fund Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015180941/http://www.poppyscotland.org.uk/index.php/content/show/about_us/who_we_are to http://www.poppyscotland.org.uk/index.php/content/show/about_us/who_we_are
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)