Talk:Earlham School of Religion

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Primary sources

edit

Hello, Thank you for adding the notice that the ESR page needed external citations to be improved. I have added some and am curious whether we have reached the bar to have the notice removed or whether additional citations would be helpful. Thanks again, Matthisrich (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Currently there's only one secondary source, so IMHO the notice should stay. Widefox; talk 13:44, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

That's fair. We can continue to improve. Is there a specific threshold we should be targeting? Matthisrich (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Who's "we"? Do you have a connection with the subject? Widefox; talk 23:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earlham School of Religion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply