Talk:Early life of Pedro II of Brazil/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Astynax in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

User Lecen had a lot of courage to create an article focusing on a particular aspect of a person – it is not very common, specially for Brazilian personalities. But he was very competent and created a long article, with relevant information, images and references. Almost everything that is worth to be read about Peter II childhood is there.

Apart from some red links, I think this must be a nominated article.

Reviewer: Tonyjeff (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Note left by Pyrotec

edit
This appears to be another "drive-by" review as per Talk:Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná/GA1 and, possibly, Talk:Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil/GA1. As with Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil message left on "reviewer's talkpage to find out status of review. Pyrotec (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive article and, I suspect, a possible WP:FAC candidate.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

I'm awarding this article GA-status. I think it has potential at WP:FAC, its your decision but if you do decide to try, put it through WP:PR first. Congratulations on the quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 09:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Pyrotec for taking the time to review and make some corrections to the article! • Astynax talk 09:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply