Talk:Earnings management
 | Earnings management has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 31, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Earnings management appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Earnings management/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 03:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Stability review
edit- Article edit history going back over one year looks fine.
- Talk page edit history going back to talk page inception similarly has no problems.
— Cirt (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Image review
edit- File:Hauptbuch Hochstetter vor 1828.jpg = only image used in article. Image hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Checks out alright there on image page.
.
— Cirt (talk) 04:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Successful good article nomination
editI am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 31, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Writing quality is good for GA standards.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to appropriate sources.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects. Sure there's room for expansion in the future, but not necessary at this point for this particular article for GA.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Article is written in a neutral tone. Matter of fact wording and presentation throughout.
- 5. Article stability? See my comments on this, above, passes here.
- 6. Images?: See my comments on this, above, passes here.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Earnings management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905162446/http://www.csus.edu/indiv/l/lundbladg/ACCY%20113/113_WA/SEC%20Sharply....pdf to http://www.csus.edu/indiv/l/lundbladg/ACCY%20113/113_WA/SEC%20Sharply....pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)