Talk:EarthForce
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EarthForce redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 4 November 2019. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Eafury-a.jpg
edit
Image:Eafury-a.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:Leftcourtfleet.JPG
edit
Image:Leftcourtfleet.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:Marinenavy.jpg
edit
Image:Marinenavy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Image copyright problem with File:B5 GROPOS 1.jpg
edit
The image File:B5 GROPOS 1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Ranks section, rank of captain is not clear, and also in wrong place
editThe rank of captain is at different levels when it comes to army and navy ranks. Normally...
An army colonel is an equivalent to a navy captain.
An army captain is an equivalent to a navy lieutenant.
If the "captain" in the list is a navy rank, as in the case of Captain Sheridan, then it would be in the same place as colonel.
In Season 1, Episode 11, "Survivors". Major Lianna Kemmer (wearing brown/olive uniform implying army/marines) correctly saluted Commander Jeffery Sinclair (wearing blue uniform implying navy/fleet). This is because an army/marine major ranks below a naval commander which in turn is one rank below naval captain.
It could lead to confusion if people assume a captain should salute a major, yet the major salute a commander which is below a captain. The list seems to make it look confusing if it does not make it clear whether it is an army or a naval captain.
Unless there is an army/marine captain in EarthForce in the Babylon 5 universe, this rank should be removed. The naval captain should be placed next to the army colonel
Thus, the list should correctly be as follows...
General/Admiral
Lt. General/Vice Admiral
Colonel/Captain
Lieutenant Colonel/Commander
Major/Lieutenant Commander
Captain/Lieutenant
Lieutenant/Lieutenant Junior Grade
Ensign
It should also be considered that if a specific rank is not available in the EarthForce system, then some other markings should take place. For example, if there is no captain in the army/marines branch in EarthForce but there is a Lieutenant in the navy/fleet branch, and if there is no Second Lieutenant in the army which is an equivalent to an Ensign in the navy, then the list should look like this...
Major/Lieutenant Commander
XXXXX/Lieutenant
Lieutenant/Lieutenant Junior Grade
XXXXX/Ensign
The above example is assuming if we stick to army/marines ranks first followed by navy/fleet equivalent. But if it does not make it look tidy, then something like...
Major/Lieutenant Commander
No army equivalent / Lieutenant
Lieutenant/Lieutenant Junior Grade
No army equivalent / Ensign — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:4880:B01:1CD8:24D0:474A:6CB3 (talk) 21:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)