Talk:Earth Party

Untitled

Should this party be refered as a Green conservative party? It was created by a Monarchist (and former leader of the main Portuguese Monarchist Party), it has been in coaltion governments with the rights, it distinguishes itself from the clearly left-wing eco-socialist/eco-communist Ecologist Party "The Greens", and besides deffending clearly green position it supports:

• Defence of culture, of language, of history and in the (sic) developement of education;
• Afirmation of Lusofony;

People's Monarchist Party and Social Democratic MPs change to the Earth Party in Parliament with relative ease, and monarchist and liberal-conservative view are frequent in them. This shouldn't go unmentioned neither in here neither in the Green Conservative article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.136.21.65 (talk) 09:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Earth Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140705112218/http://www.liberal-international.org/site/Observer_Members.html to http://www.liberal-international.org/site/Observer_Members.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604064631/http://www.libertas.eu/ to http://www.libertas.eu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Earth Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.aldeparty.eu/en/members/political-parties
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604064631/http://www.libertas.eu/en/news/news-portugal/257-libertas-and-mpt-announce-european-election-partnership to http://www.libertas.eu/en/news/news-portugal/257-libertas-and-mpt-announce-european-election-partnership
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708193902/http://www.correiodominho.com/noticias.php?id=5881 to http://www.correiodominho.com/noticias.php?id=5881
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129052545/http://www.aldeparty.eu/en/news/alde-party-welcomes-new-member-parties to http://www.aldeparty.eu/en/news/alde-party-welcomes-new-member-parties

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

The MPT isn't really conservative anymore

They have indeed been created by right-wing monarchists and ally with PSD and PP occasionally, but they're not really conservatives anymore. If you take a look at their electoral manifesto you'll find they advocate for progressive measures such as "allowing adoption to expand to singles and same-sex couples" (p.11), maximizing gross domestic happiness and abolishing public funding of political parties, not to mention a bigger state presence in health issues. The MPT is not conservative (anymore)

Upoorde (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

@Upoorde: Do you have reliable sources documenting the MPT's shift away from conservatism? Right now, it seems like it's only your personal analysis of a primary source, when secondary sources are usually preferred. Ezhao02 (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

@Ezhao02: I have none that confirms a shift away, nor one that states otherwise. If you do, however, take a look at their program whose link I've placed (regardeless of being a primary source) they openly state they're not conseravtives. In their proposals pages, you'll see in the upper right corner a "political compass" of where their ideas on each particular topic stand:. They never place their ideas in the conservative sides of the spectrum, they're always either in the liberal sides or in the center. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Upoorde (talk) 23:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

@Upoorde: Thanks for the response. There are two issues with using that as a source. First, the MPT's party program is a primary source. If they're saying that they're not conservatives, they could be lying or trying to mislead people, since they're writing about themselves. Second, we do need a source talking about the shift, since there was/is a reliable secondary source calling the MPT green-conservative. Ezhao02 (talk) 00:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

full agreement with Ezhao02. A party stating or self-describing their own ideology is not a reliable source.--Autospark (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

References