Talk:Earthquake (Modern Family)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleEarthquake (Modern Family) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 3, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
March 10, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Earthquake (Modern Family)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GAN on hold

edit

I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have placed the article on hold until the following issues are addressed. As you address each issue, state how you addressed it (if necessary). If you disagree with a particular issue, state your rationale for doing so after the issue in question so a compromise can be reached.

  1. In the lead, the second paragraph is lacking ending punctuation.
  2. The winners for the 2011 WGAs have been announced, make sure to update the lead.
  3. We can have one non-free image in the infobox if there is an adequate FUR included on the image's page. Good job on adding the free image of Lane though.
  4. "The episode begins with Haley..." The sentence doesn't need the lead in, just start with "Haley..." (make sure to adjust the tense for the rest of the sentence).
  5. "Soon Phil convinces Luke (Nolan Gould) the bookshelf didn't fall." Contractions should not be used in articles unless in quotes. Fix all occurrences.
  6. "...to Haley is because Haley is Claire." This should be clarified as it could be confusing to readers.
  7. "Meanwhile Cameron (Eric Stonestreet) & Mitchell..." "and Mitchell". Fix any other occurrences, ampersands should not be used in articles unless part of a title.
  8. "The episode was written by Paul Corrigan & Brad Walsh making it their fifth writing credit for the series. The episode..." Reword one of the beginnings of the sentences as it sounds redundant.
  9. "The episode also tied for being the highest rated scripted show with Glee's "Grilled Cheesus"." The lead lists it as the highest rated Wednesday show, and here with another show. Fix the dabs for Glee.
    I don't quite understand #9 NoD'ohnuts (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnutsReply
    Currently, if you click on the link for Glee, it goes to a disambiguation page. You need to specify what article the link should take the readers to, in this case the TV show. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 23:32, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  10. "TV Squad's Joel Keller gave the episode a positive review "that...". Lead into the review instead of just pasting it in, maybe "positive review, writing that "it was a...".
  11. "James Poniewozik of Time..." Time should be italicized. Do the same for TV Guide. TV Squad is also linked to twice in the same section.
  12. "and October 9, 2010.[19]Paul Corrigan..." Fix the spacing between the citation and the name.
  13. For the citations' titles, they shouldn't be in all caps. Fix citations 1 & 14.
  14. "Paul Corrigan and Brad Walsh are received a nomination for an Episodic Comedy at the 2010 Writers Guild of America Awards" Fix the tense; also, which WGA awards is it? 2010 or 2011 (the lead says 2011).

Some of the above issues were raised in the peer review, make sure to go back and fix any other issues I may have overlooked. Altogether, this article was informative on the topic and is well-sourced. Most of the above issues shouldn't be too difficult to address, but if you have any questions on them, please let me know. I have left the article on hold for seven days for the issues to be addressed. If they are fixed in this time, I will pass the article. If not, the article may be failed and can be renominated at WP:GAN. If necessary to address the above issues, and progress is being made, an extension may be provided. If you have any questions or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 01:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I went through and re-wrote the plot and added a screenshot with a FUR to the infobox. Address the remaining issues above that are new or weren't resolved the first time and I'll pass the article. Let me know if there are any questions. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 05:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I believe I am finished NoD'ohnuts (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnutsReply

GA passed

edit

Good job with addressing the above issues. I believe the article meets the GA criteria and have passed the article. I would recommend for any future episode nominations to have another editor or two copyedit the article. There were a lot of simple mistakes for this article that should have been fixed prior to nominating. Continue to maintain the article to ensure it upholds its GA status. I would recommend using WebCite to archive all of the citations to prevent linkrot.

Also, to anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the very large backlog. Instructions can be found here. Each new reviewer that helps to review articles will help to reduce the time that articles wait to be reviewed. If you are new to reviewing and want to familiarize yourself with the process, study the GA criteria, look at other editors' reviews, and leave any questions you have at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations if you need feedback while performing a review.

Keep up the good work, and I encourage you to continue to bring articles up to good article status. If anyone disagrees with this review, an alternate opinion can be sought at Good article reassessment. If you have any further questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 05:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Nathan Lane.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Nathan Lane.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Earthquake (Modern Family). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Earthquake (Modern Family). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earthquake (Modern Family). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply