While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Easey Street murders is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
It is important that we use reliable sourcing. Before we use a political blog of questionable quality, perhaps we could find sources that are more widely accepted? If such sources cannot be found then we must ask why not.
Independent Australia has long been the subject of negative comment on WP:RSN. Basically it either reprints material found elsewhere, or just makes shit up. -Pete (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's what Template:Verify source and Template:Unreliable source? are for - to give editors the opportunity to check the information, potentially find the reliable source information has been lifted from, and work to WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM. Removing dubious sources and leaving the information taken from them intact is counterproductive. However, in this case the article has much bigger problems of fundamental details of the case lacking any citation, so I've tagged the article rather than restore this once source, in the hope that improved sourcing throughout will also cover the material in question. U-Mos (talk) 10:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
