Talk:East Bay High School

Untitled

Listen the mascot is the "Fighting Indians"! I got to this school and as I type this I am in Web Design! Keep it as is! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.254.226.55 (talk • contribs) .

The website seems to back up this claim. --TeaDrinker 17:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Um, no it doesn't. And as a student at the school, I can verify that it isn't. TheRaven7 20:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The only noteable evidence I have found is the phrase "Home of the Indians!" on the school's official website. Do you (or anyone else) have any evidence to cite supporting or refuting that the mascot is an indian? --ElKevbo 20:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I thought you meant it backed up the manatee claim, TeaDrinker. No, the website does, in fact, back up the fact that the mascot is the Indian because it still is. Reading comprehension error on my part. TheRaven7 00:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Problems with unsourced claims

This article had a number of unsourced claims that I removed. Particularly I am concerned about calling the area an "immigration region", the assertion that the name "Fighting Indians" is "non-politically correct", and the claim that FCAT scores were a "D" for the school. While it may be "True" that this is the case, the standard for inclusion in Wikipedia is not "Truth", but rather it is verifiability. Unsourced and poorly sourced claims made in articles should be removed.

The FCAT has a web page at http://fcat.fldoe.org/default.asp where you can look up East Bay High School's scores. In no place is the score of the school rated a "D", and while it certainly appears that East Bay High School has much room for improvement, it doesn't look like their scores are very far out of line from other schools in the state. They look like they are slightly below average in a couple of areas and slightly above average in others. In any case, it isn't up to Wiki editors to interpret these results. We can cite reliable sources that comment about the scores, so if Jane Doe, a reporter for the local newspaper, writes that "East Bay scores a D" -- then we can include that information.

I also removed the silly section about "Criticism" or "Controversy", which appears to be the complaint of an editor that attends the school. This information is what Wikipedia calls original research and it isn't allowed. We can only include information that has been verifiable published by reliable sources.

Feel free to add whatever information you want to the article, but make sure that you CITE YOUR SOURCES! Vivaldi (talk) 04:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Great job, Vivaldi, for feeling the need to edit a page you know nothing about. Of course the FCAT website doesn't say anything about the D score, because the school scores given because of FCAT scores are separate from the actual FCAT scores of the students in the school. I don't understand why you felt the need to delete it instead of just using the {{fact}} tag that you used on everything else, like what towns are adjacent to Gibsonton (stupid).

Also, I'm glad you're concerned that I think calling Native Americans "Indians" when they in fact aren't from the country of India is not politically correct, I am concerned that you are concerned.

And let me ask you about your stupid little thing about the original research crap. What you're saying is that my information is not reliable UNTIL I GET SOMEONE ELSE TO SAY IT? How does that make any sense whatsoever? By just having a local reporter say something second-hand, that makes the information so much more reliable than a primary source, but by the same token if that same local reporter were to put the information into this wikipedia article herself, it wouldn't be reliable because that would be original research on her part? Nice logic there. TheRaven7 01:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Just in case there is any doubt, Vivaldi is right, Raven. Adding proper sources would allow me (a person who knows nothing about the school) to edit the page. That is the point. Caper13 19:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Earl J. Lennard and Spoto High Schools

Can someone make a page for both schools?I've requested both schools and I don't think anyone will go to make them-DogPHman 05:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

This article does not belong on Wikipedia

I have marked this page for speedy deletion as the only people that wil ever visit this article are persons directly involved with the school.

I am a student here, so no, I am NOT nominating this article for speedy deletion out of spite.

Please check Special:Whatlinkshere/East_Bay_High_School to note that this article is not notable.Segin 19:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Segin. Please tell me what sources you are using to determine that the only people who will ever visit this article are those directly involved in the school. First thing, I am here and I am not involved with the school. Secondly, that is not a reason to speedy delete an article. Maybe I am missing something here, but you seem to be awfully quick with the speedy delete. Chill. You can respond with your reasons on my talk page.Caper13 19:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I am not directly involved with the school today, but I did graduate in 1980. I am chagrined that I am not one of the "Notable" people who graduated. But some day that may be fixed. This school has been around since the 1950s, and is the center of culture of Eastern Hillsborough county. There are plenty of alumni that would visit this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.32.50.2 (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

This article needs serious editing

Almost everything below Mascot motto and colors needs to be deleted. All of the famous people are not famous and an infamous section is laughable. None of the reviews of the coaches are relevant, and the saying a high school football wins 5 to 6 games is not worth mentioning. It appears the article has turned into a place for shameless self promotion, or general tom foolery. I am deleting the material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glamajamma (talk • contribs) 12:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I also removed the statement that said Gibsonton is a rapidly developing area. I have been to Gibsonton and I highly doubt any publication of note sees it as a rapidly developing area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glamajamma (talk • contribs) 12:31, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I am removing the entire section on Alumni. The alumni added have no citations, and morons keep adding stupid stuff, like Tupac Shakur. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glamajamma (talk • contribs) 22:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)