Talk:East Bengal Ultras/GA2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: KylieInTheSkylie (talk · contribs) 00:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead does not meet expectations, see last GAN. Specifically it should be longer and more referenced.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   If you could find more sources, it would bring this up to a pass. Most sources only talk about the tifos.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   May be out of scope.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Closed, Nom is affected by Cyclone Amphan and therefore is taking a wikibreak. See the above for reasons on why it wasn't passed.

    Comment: 2nd opinion was given by SounderBruce.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.