Talk:East Germany at the Olympics

Olympics High‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany: GDR High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	East Germany portal This article is supported by the GDR task force (assessed as High-importance).

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Incredible Whitewash

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The authors of the original piece must be retired Stasi, given the perfunctory coverage of the organized doping. Any Olympian who engaged in (knowingly or not) such drug use today would be stripped of their medals and banned from the sport. It is amazing that the article attempts to justify the records by pointing out that the drugs were not the only component of success. The drugs are a disqualifying component of the success, and no post hoc analysis of competitors' origins can excuse that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.71.227 (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Over-sourcing

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We don't need sixteen sources to verify a fact. One to three sources will do. ask123 (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Germany at the Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160321114346/http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/countries/GDR/ to http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/countries/GDR

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic