Talk:East Stour, Kent

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:East Stour, Kent/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article should complement the main article on River Stour, which in turn should be the lead article to give a comprehensive view of this river system. It should not be read as a separate river - just a tributary Peter Shearan (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 01:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 14:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Stour, Kent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply