Talk:Easton Historic District (Easton, Maryland)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Trey Wainman in topic Improving Easton Historic District
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Easton Historic District (Easton, Maryland) (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 24 August 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Maryland may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Improving Easton Historic District
editI have added numerous photographs and content. This should be a B-Class or Good Article now. TwoScars (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Instead, it improved from Stub to Start class. What does the article need to get it up to B-Class and/or Good Article? TwoScars (talk) 20:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yea that is strange, this is definitely a at least at least a C class article. I would raise its grading but im not part of WikiProject Maryland or WikiProject NRoHP. @TwoScars Trey Wainman (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Trey Wainman: I have been involved with about a dozen Maryland articles, and I cannot ever remember hearing a "peep" from WikiProject Maryland. Darnestown Presbyterian Church, St. Michaels Historic District, Seneca, Maryland, Ratcliffe Manor, and this article all are ignored by that project. The other Maryland articles that received a GA rating were mostly reviewed by people from WikiProject Military history that know me from Civil War articles. TwoScars (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- @TwoScars After reviewing the article again and reviewing the WikiProject Maryland Grading Criteria. I'll increase the rating to a B for this article. I'd still keep your peer review open just incase someone feels like my assessment was wrong. I am doing this out of good faith that members of the WikiProject Maryland agree with this assessment. While I am not a member of the WikiProject Maryland I'm doing this out of a sprit of collaboration.
- Now when it comes to the WikiProject NRoHP, I'm am going to leave it, I recommend that you may want to go and see if they have a assessment request section on their project page. Trey Wainman (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Trey Wainman: I appreciate the time you spent on this. Thank you very much. TwoScars (talk)
- @Trey Wainman: I have been involved with about a dozen Maryland articles, and I cannot ever remember hearing a "peep" from WikiProject Maryland. Darnestown Presbyterian Church, St. Michaels Historic District, Seneca, Maryland, Ratcliffe Manor, and this article all are ignored by that project. The other Maryland articles that received a GA rating were mostly reviewed by people from WikiProject Military history that know me from Civil War articles. TwoScars (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yea that is strange, this is definitely a at least at least a C class article. I would raise its grading but im not part of WikiProject Maryland or WikiProject NRoHP. @TwoScars Trey Wainman (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)