Talk:Ecclesiae Unitatem
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Esoglou in topic Why this article?
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Some references
edit- {{cite web | url=http://www.ncregister.com/daily/cdf_assumes_sspx_file/ | title=CDF Assumes SSPX File| date=2009-07-08 | accessdate=2009-07-08 | publisher=[[National Catholic Register]] | last=Pentin | first=Edward}}
- {{cite web | title=Pope removes officials seen as responsible for Holocaust-denying bishop row | url=http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/pope-removes-officials-seen-responsible-holocaust-denying-bishop-row | date=2009-07-08 | accessdate=2009-07-08 | last=Allen | first=John | publisher=[[National Catholic Reporter]] | authorlink=John L. Allen, Jr.}}
gives
- Pentin, Edward (2009-07-08). "CDF Assumes SSPX File". National Catholic Register. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
- Allen, John (2009-07-08). "Pope removes officials seen as responsible for Holocaust-denying bishop row". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
Why this article?
editThe importance of this document ia its effect on the story of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei. What counts is the contents of the document, the difference it made to the Commission, not the document as such. The contents are rightly dealt with in the article on the Commission, Why have an article also on the document? Sounds silly. At least to me. Esoglou (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)