Talk:Ecclesiastical titles and styles

The Pope

Shouldn't the Pope be on this list? 2602:306:BD87:D2C0:84B5:5C80:AC27:6952 (talk) 20:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Fr. Brad

Globalize?

I honestly have no idea if forms of address would be different in other English-speaking countries, but since that's what the article implies now I'm putting {{globalize}} on it. I would assume other languages would use different forms, but I'm not sure that's really under the scope of the English Wikipedia. BryanG^(talk) 20:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, they are different, which is why the page was changed in the first place (does no one bother to read "histories"?) and why it is in present form. The hope is that now that the US is done, someone from the UK, from Ireland, etc. will come and add appropriate, accurate, up-to-date sections.HarvardOxon 00:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, didn't think to read the history. Learn something new every day... BryanG^(talk) 01:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Cardinals

I wonder how 'Cardinal John Smith' is preferred over 'John Cardinal Smith'. Is there some kind of standard out there? I don't think there is any kind of US convention either way as I see both formats used. --Sephiroth9611 00:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

It is the style used by the Vatican Press Office itself and the Catholic News Service. The former style is an obsolete holdover from European styles of royalty and was, fully, "The Most Reverend and Most Eminent Lord John, of the title of the Church of Saint Mary Cardinal Presbyter of the Holy Roman Church, Smith." HarvardOxon 02:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

In fact there are plenty of archdioceses that use this form, to the point where it is an exaggeration to call it "obsolete." Given that the intent of the Wikipedia site is to be comprehensive, a better solution is to acknowledge both forms. It certainly does no harm. 1995hoo 20:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Address for a Prior

The article lists the direct address for a Prior who's full name is Fr. John Smith O.P. as Fr. Smith. In my experience working with, for and being educated by members of a religious order of men, they almost always go by their first name since it is often different from their baptismal name and chosen at their profession. I believe the proper direct address for a prior therefore would be either Fr. John (Or Br. John if he isn't ordained) or Prior John. The only time I have ever seen members of a religious order use their surname in address is when they are doing parish work and a Prior would not be thusly employed. I haven't changed it because I think there should be discussion before editing articles. Kjrjr (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)kjrjr

Protestant

There are examples of titles and styles to Catholic and Orthodox clergy.. but what about Anglican and Lutheran clergy? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ecclesiastical titles and styles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stylebook/stylebooksample.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204212305/http://www.usfca.edu/uploadedFiles/Destinations/Offices_and_Services/Communications_and_Marketing/docs/USF_StyleGuide.pdf to http://www.usfca.edu/uploadedFiles/Destinations/Offices_and_Services/Communications_and_Marketing/docs/USF_StyleGuide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)