This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eclipse 550 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Project Canada"
editI am expecting that this variant will be different enough to have a new model number once it is announced and get enough press attention that we will have a separate article about it. - Ahunt (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- We could wait till its description here is big enough to necessitate its own article. Seems a bit larger variant to me, like the piper M600 from the M500. --Marc Lacoste (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- I am anticipating that as soon as the new model is announced and given a model number we will have enough info to create a new article about it at that point. - Ahunt (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- It should wait till its launch then, Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball :) --Marc Lacoste (talk) 18:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, that is why I said "as soon as the new model is announced and given a model number". Right now it is just a concept or perhaps a prototype under construction, but we don't have enough for a stand alone article yet, which is why the info is parked in this article for now. - Ahunt (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- At this point, given the financial issues faced by the company and the fact that the complete aircraft has yet to fly (just the wing has flown so far), I think this should wait for the prototype to fly before we create a separate article on it. - Ahunt (talk) 01:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- I agree, that is why I said "as soon as the new model is announced and given a model number". Right now it is just a concept or perhaps a prototype under construction, but we don't have enough for a stand alone article yet, which is why the info is parked in this article for now. - Ahunt (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- It should wait till its launch then, Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball :) --Marc Lacoste (talk) 18:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- I am anticipating that as soon as the new model is announced and given a model number we will have enough info to create a new article about it at that point. - Ahunt (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)