Talk:Ecological extinction

Political campaign

"Implications for conservation policy

Conservation policy has historically lagged behind current science all over the world, but at this critical juncture politicians must make the effort to catch up before massive extinctions occur on our planet. [...] It is now that the governments of the world must act in order to prevent this catastrophe of the loss of biodiversity from progressing further and wasting all of the time and money spent on previous conservation efforts."

That sounds pretty much like a political campaign to me. I am not saying that politicans should not do anything about the threats of climate change and biodiversity loss, but a wikipedia page is normally not the right place to ask for political change, right?

- ajf

Sea star image

We should replace this image with one of the ochre sea star. This one is a bit misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.143.49 (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Keystone Species

This section reads like a summary of the source article to the section. it should just be presented in clear concise statements presenting the facts of the source. Basically omit every instance of "the study found" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frazier90 (talk • contribs) 06:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)