Talk:Economic impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Economic impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Economic impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Economic impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Vodka? Seriously?
editWhat kind of stereotypes, couldn't they find photos of another product than a random photo of a shelf with vodka. 176.120.205.56 (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well the important part is the sign, do you have a picture of another Russian product being taken off the shelves? Slatersteven (talk) 17:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Outdated
editSuch an important article, yet so outdated as indicated by passages such as "The Russian economy is expected to shrink by 11% by the end of the year". This was written in 2022 and never amended. I just hope someone with enough spare time takes reworks this article so that it reflects situation as we know it today rather than back in 2022. Gorgedweller (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's why we have not news, article should be written in past tense about events that have happened, not ones that might. Slatersteven (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Renaming to "Economic consequences..."
editIf nobody significantly objects to this, I will be renaming this article to "Economic consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine". Impact is a proscribed, jargon word that—when used figuratively—means "strong/violent/marked effect". Firstly, there's no one effect of the invasion, but more importantly, saying "economic strong/violent/marked effect" is a leading statement and precludes the need for the article body itself. Getsnoopy (talk) 19:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 September 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
My request is that the first paragraph be changed accordingly:
The economic impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine began in late February 2022, in the days after Russia recognized two breakaway Ukrainian republics and launched an invasion of Ukraine. The subsequent economic sanctions have targeted large parts of the Russian economy, Russian oligarchs, and members of the Russian government.[1][2][3][4] Consequently, a wave of protests and strikes occurred across Europe against the rising cost of living.
"Russia responded in kind" was replaced with "Consequently". The reason is that the following statement does not appear to be directly caused by Russia, or if it is, it should be further elaborated upon. STRFabs (talk) 04:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm missing something in my skim through, but it's weird neither that nor the subsequent sentence seem to be covered in the body of the article. Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- This change appears to have already been made before this edit request was made, maybe the requesting editor was looking at an old diff? - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)