Talk:Economizer

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2409:4042:2D92:1917:ABA2:67FE:C56E:670B in topic Model of economizer micro project

I would like to add the following text to the bottom of the powerplant paragraph and would appreciate any suggestions as to appropriateness

However, the thermal efficiency of this section of the power plant can be significantly affected by a build up of fine ash particles generated when the fuel source is burned. It is not unusual to find ash mountains within economiser units which means they require extensive and lengthy manual cleaning. Rotary steam soot blowers are sometimes used but because of their design they lack real penetrating power and so sonic soot blowers are now generally used to prevent the ash particles from settling out in the economizer section. These sonic soot blowers use high energy-low frequency sound waves with frequencies generally between 350 Hz down to 60 Hz. As they are sounded for a few minutes at regular intervals the ash is prevented from settling out and therefore continues within the gas stream to then be separated our downstream in either a baghouse filter or electro static precipitator. Collieman (talk) 15:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Question on use of (British?) word "Display/Displays" 06/29/18

edit

In reading the article, there are 5 uses of the word display, or displays, and I don't "get it". I went to the Cambridge English dictionary, and couldn't find any meaning fitting the context here. I copied the article and changed "display" to "system" and re-read those sentences, they made somewhat more sense..

Thanks! WardXmodem (talk) 22:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I agree; "display" is clearly not the correct word to use. "System" may be better, but I'm honestly not sure. There are other peculiarities in the article that lead me to conclude that the article was written by someone whose first language is not English. I don't doubt the technical expertise of the author. The article would be first-rate if written better. At least I try (talk) 20:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Economizer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Model of economizer micro project

edit

Give me report 2409:4042:2D92:1917:ABA2:67FE:C56E:670B (talk) 06:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply