Talk:Economy Act of March 20, 1933

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

Untitled

edit

The link to the text of the act is broken. Davidcox1 16:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Redirect

edit

I created a redirect from the page Economy Act Agreement for Purchasing Good or Services Watersoftheoasis 01:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit

What is the chapter number and United States Statutes At-large number? I can't find it anywhere. —Markles 23:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

In the New Deal site it say that the ycut that salarys and the pensions by 40 %. Here it says 15 %. What's the right one??!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.224.174.195 (talk) 14:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economy Act of March 20, 1933. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply