Wikipedia

Talk:Economy of Hungary

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 154.161.51.56 in topic Good done
Learn more about this page

TOC

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article is cribbed wholesale from the U.S. State Department's Background Note on Hungary from August, 1999. Therefore, it appears to be not only obviously out-of-date, but also plagiarized. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.232.231.31 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 24 October 2006.



I have deleted the questioned part and am in the process of writing a new one. Mrgann (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please add more info about the high amount of tax evasion in Hungary. It's a real problem and prevents the country from developing.--Sonjaaa 12:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The cited source [1] does not contain the data: GDP $225.5 billion (PPP, 2013 est.) and GDP growth 2.2% (Real, 2013 est.), only GDP $125.5 billion (2012 fact) [2] and GDP growth -1.7% ([3]. This should be fixed. 78.139.0.254 (talk) 16:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Present-day Hungarian economy =

edit 
 Hungary's economic situation has not changed quite significantly since 2011. Is there a usual badge that we could put on the page that it is seriously outdated to warn the readers until a competent editor contributes the updates?

Merge of Economic Transition of Hungary

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Simply, this is short article on part of the history of the Hungarian economy. It would be better served as part of this article placing the information in a wider context. Nuttah68 19:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm am not sure exactly the protocol here, but I agree that the two articles should be merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.65.23 (talk) 22:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Separate History of the Hungarian economy page

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have created a separate History of the Hungarian economy page because I believe that a) this is an extremely long chunk of text b) has a different purpose: this page should serve as an overview of the current state of the economy and only contain a shortened historical part. Mrgann (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Group project on Economy of Hungary

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. There are going to be major changes in this Wikipedia article. Our English class decided to make this article better, preferably a Good or Featured Article. It is a four man (woman) project, including myself, with the help of our teacher, and of course, with the help of you. We would appreciate any help, comment, suggestion, criticism. Have a nice day Yusolein (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

You have my support :-) varbal (talk)

GA

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have quickfailed this article as a GAN, because it obviously and clearly has no chance of passing. Many sections are completely unreferenced, the language is partisan and inappropriate, the lead section is too short and the prose is poor. Ironholds (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Questionable Sentence in the Lede

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

User Hortobagy tries to add the following sentence to the lede: "However, Hungary's recession deepened in the last 5 years.". This claim doesn't have any place in the lede, since: (1) it was a personal opinion of an analyst, not a solid fact; (2) its obsolete (10 months old), and the Hungarian Economy produced the 3rd fastest growth in the whole European Union in Q1 2013 (0.7%); (3) this article is about a general overview of the Hungarian Economy and not a newspaper or a collection of arbitrary subjective opinions, especially not in the lede. Please, reply to my argument before replacing that sentence. Cheers, KœrteFa {ταλκ} 20:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

economy of hungary is in crisis, if you don't trust me see on Google.

http://www.google.hu/#output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=hungary+economy+crisis&oq=hungary+economy+crisis&gs_l=hp.3..0i10i30.1877.6835.0.7100.24.20.1.3.3.5.1272.5723.0j12j4j2j7-2.20.0...0.0...1c.1.14.psy-ab.GctI-05u3Us&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.46751780,d.Yms&fp=370d3e1263a643a2&biw=1366&bih=643 Hortobagy (talk) 20:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Are you serious? First, please note that: Google searches are not valid sources. Second, recently there were two *global* financial crises (one of them may still be here), of course Hungary was also deeply affected (like most of the countries in the world). However, the latest growth data shows that this may not be the case any more [4]. Third, more importantly, the lede is no place for cherry-picked, obsolete information. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 21:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hahhh, so you admit I was right. Yes, Hungary is in recession and this has to explained there, up in the front. Hortobagy (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
It *was* in recession. Of course, you are welcome to write a section in the article about how the global financial crises affected Hungary, but then you should consider several facts and try to give a balanced, neutral and broad overview of these events. Of course, using reliable sources is also essential. Sadly, you just cherry-picked the title of an article and placed it in the lede. Unfortunately, that's not acceptable. Cheers, KœrteFa {ταλκ} 21:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Because it resumes so well the current situation. No lies please. Hortobagy (talk) 21:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please, consider seriously answering my arguments. Writing *some* reply does not mean that you have addressed the arguments at all. Talking about "lies" does not help our discussion either. Why do you want to insert that one cherry-picked sentence? KœrteFa {ταλκ} 21:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Because the general opinion and mass-media and investors have this opinion : that now Hungary is in big problem. This is a fact and has to be reflected in the article. Don't ask me to provide more references from Financial Times or other... because I can. Hortobagy (talk) 21:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome to contribute to the article in a balanced and neutral way. You can, of course, chose your sources, but don't just put one sentence without providing a wider picture. Cherry-picked information based on half truths, especially if they are obsolete (since you are talking in present), have no place in the lede. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 21:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Hortobagy (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Economy of Hungary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello everyone, I am working for the International Trade Centre (ITC), a UN/WTO agency that aims to promote sustainable economic development through trade promotion. I would like to propose the addition of an external link (http://www.macmap.org/QuickSearch/FindTariff/FindTariff.aspx?subsite=open_access&country=348&source=1%7CITC) that leads directly to our online database of customs tariffs applied by Hungary. Visitors can easily look up market access information for Hungary by selecting the product and partner of their interest. I would like you to consider this link under the WP:ELYES #3 prescriptions. Moreover, the reliability and the pertinence of this link can be supported by the following facts 1) ITC is part of the United Nations, and aims to share trade and market access data on by country and product as a global public good 2) No registration is required to access this information 3) Market access data (Tariffs and non-tariff measures) are regularly updated

Thank you, Divoc (talk) 09:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dr. Simonovits's comment on this article

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dr. Simonovits has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:


I have no found any grave error. It is quite schematic, the reader would not find any important difference from Slovakia or Romania. As a destructive critique: try to avoid ranking, since they are meaningless. To give an example: It is better to be the last in LEXP within EU with 90% of the maximal LEXP rather than to be the second with 80% of the maximum.


We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Simonovits has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:


  • Reference : Andras Simonovits, 2014. "Design Errors in Public Pension Systems: The Case of Hungary," IEHAS Discussion Papers 1414, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Economy of Hungary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Economy of Hungary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Economy of Hungary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 20 external links on Economy of Hungary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Non neutral language

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The summary reads like State propaganda and should be edited for neutrality. 2601:989:4284:2D60:1130:4526:CA7B:E8B5 (talk) 21:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

GDP per capita data is not right

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GDP per capita data is not right. Currently, Hungary's GDP per capita in nominal is around 18,900$, while in PPP it's around 42,000$. Keehnan455 (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Economic history between the Anjou era and WWII is missing

edit
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Apparently there is a huge gap in the history of Hungary's economy in this article 2A00:1110:111:D2B8:A4DA:33B4:26D7:31B5 (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good done

edit
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

All about your work you don 154.161.51.56 (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Economy_of_Hungary&oldid=1217544477"