Talk:Economy of Syria

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bbb23 in topic Help

Proposed merger

edit

Re proposed merger with the 'Economy' section under Syria, please see Talk:Syria.--Splitpeasoup 00:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Economy of Syria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Now checked - the three infoprod.il pages were not crawled because of the site's robots.txt file, so I've reverted them and left the strategicforesight.com link. All three reverted links are appended inside the ref tag with {{cbignore}}. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

§Energy and mineral resources

edit

Looking at the respective lengths of both §Oil and natural gas and Nuclear energy in Syria, I feel that the former is long enough to become an article of its own (and thereby also help the section remain proportionate to the rest of the main article), while the latter is short enough (and will likely remain short enough - I can't see Russia assisting in a nuclear programme given Syria's current political situation) to be merged back into the Economy of Syria article.

I wanted to get a consensus before I made either of the changes. Please let me know. Thank you — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 18:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ridiculously high unemployment rate in infobox

edit

Per e.g. Statista—which, I believe, cites the World Bank—the unemployment rate of 50% as stated in the infobox seems insanely high. I'm hesitant to delete it because the source is The World Factbook (section "Economy"; subsection "Unemployment rate"), but it just seems too high; how did they ever reach that number? —Biscuit-in-Chief :-) (/tɔːk//ˈkɒntɹɪbs/) 23:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Help

edit

The page is showing errors so I’m asking for an advanced editor to correct the errors as displayed here. You need to be logged in to do this. Thanks, 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

If you have a change you wish made to the article, you must specify the change. Otherwise, we have no way of knowing what "errors" you're referring to.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply