Talk:Ecotopia

Fair use rationale for Image:Ecotopia Cover.jpg

Image:Ecotopia Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

As someone who has read the novel

How were my edits unjustified? I have read Ecotopia (ISBN-13: 978-0960432011), it reads like a hyper-Right wing Fan fiction that makes the Beckist connect the dots book (ISBN-13: 978-1414334905), seem like a reasonable Amy Goodman lecture. regionalist/race baiting Right-wing fantasy "novel"

Ecotopia is a fun read, if... you get turned on by reading The Turner Diaries (ISBN-10: 1569800863), Mien Kamph (ISBN: 0944092403), the Left Behind series, Sara Palin's Going Rogue: An American Life or .T. Edson' The South Will Rise Again.

This book exists, therefore the article should, but the article is too long and ignores the novels promotion of overt racial segregationist, misogynist, community blood sports, terrorist and the expectation that Ecotopian female healthcare providers must perform sex acts on male patients as part of a "holistic" medical approach. But hey, at lest Ecotopians recycle! :)

66.108.243.166 (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Moi

public access television

It's been too long since I read the novel to recall the use of television in it, but from the article's text, it seems that its use is more like public access t.v. than reality t.v. (which is at least in part staged and scripted). Public access was broadcasting library events and meetings, town hall/city council meetings and the like by the early '80s.Kdammers (talk) 01:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I thin you're right about that.Joel Russ (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Similar book

Die Gelehrtenrepublik by Arno Schmidt has many parallels to this book. Years ago, Callenbach answered a letter I wrote to him, saying that he had never heard of Schmidt. Still, the coincidences are interesting. Kdammers (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ecotopia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060417131622/http://www.ecotopia.be/ to http://www.ecotopia.be/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)