Talk:Ecotourism in Costa Rica
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hey, this is a new page, focusing specifically on ecotourism in Costa Rica. It will provide information about the costs and benefits of ecotourism on the environment and the countries economy. It's very focused and less about costa rica as a country and more about the sector of ecotourism in the country
- Hi there, see WP:STUDENTS regarding your homework assignment to write this article. As I mentioned, I have userfied the page for you here: User:Samadi91/Ecotourism in Costa Rica. I suggest you work on it there. If you like, you can message me when you are done and I will have a look at it and assist you in moving it back into Article space if it is suitable. Thanks, Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 10:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Dr. Derviz's comment on this article
editDr. Derviz has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
Watch the grammar! The "Current situation" section begins with an ungrammatical sentence: "biodiversity and immense ecosystem" are meant to be properties of the country, not of ecotourism.
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Derviz has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
- Reference : Alexis Derviz, 2013. "Collateral Composition, Diversification Risk, and Systemically Important Merchant Banks," Working Papers 2013/11, Czech National Bank, Research Department.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ecotourism in Costa Rica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090710232714/http://www.new7wonders.com/nature/en/nominees/top77/ to http://www.new7wonders.com/nature/en/nominees/top77/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121209063140/http://www.iisd.org/susprod/ecotour.pdf to http://www.iisd.org/susprod/ecotour.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100401003405/http://www.bncr.fi.cr/bn/turismo/dowlands/BNCR%20-%20Anuario%20de%20Turismo%202008.pdf to http://www.bncr.fi.cr/bn/turismo/dowlands/BNCR%20-%20Anuario%20de%20Turismo%202008.pdf
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120505092852/http://epi.yale.edu/epi2012/rankings to http://epi.yale.edu/epi2012/rankings
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)