Talk:Ecstasy (My Bloody Valentine album)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ecstasy (My Bloody Valentine album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Ecstasy (My Bloody Valentine album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 17, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incorrect name!
editThe name of this article should be Ecstasy (EP) not Ecstacy (EP), but I'm afraid that if I change it all the links to this article will be misdirected, perhaps we should redirect Ecstacy (EP) here after renaming it Ecstasy (EP).
Album or EP?
editMusicBrainz has this listed as an album, not an EP. I'm not sure what it was officially released as. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.199.152 (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Allmusic also has it as a mini-LP. It also charted on the UK indie album chart, and the catalogue number also indicates that it's an album. So...it's an album.--Michig (talk) 10:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ecstasy (My Bloody Valentine album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Вик Ретлхед (talk · contribs) 22:23, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Alright, this one is next in line. Initial notes coming soon.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:23, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Before I go through the rest of the article, could you fix some issues with the punctuation: ex. "too jingly jangly." should be "too jingly jangly" or "larger than the sum of its parts." should be "larger than the sum of its parts". On the positive note, the text looks solidly written and well-composed. Definitely a strong candidate for GA.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done Sure thing, fixed. --Idiotchalk (t@lk) 16:27, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Went over the prose again and did some unlinking on a few words. I didn't find any major issues, so I'll pass the article. Thanks for all your work on this one.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 16:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)