Talk:Ed Dobson

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

How is this article "copyright infringement"? Everything on the page is properly cited to academic standards. -SHLAMA (talk) 06:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Large portions of the text are taken from the following document: http://www.zondervan.com/Cultures/en-US/Authors/Author.htm?ContributorID=DobsonE&QueryStringSite=Zondervan
I affirm my previous request for either complete reworking or speedy deletion. – moonty (talk) (contribs) 07:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Two sentences = "large portions"? 98% of the content is NOT from the indicated site! There are about a dozen sources behind this article! -SHLAMA (talk) 08:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am removing the template, as I see nothing in this article that implies copyvio on that link. Ford MF (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
The article was significantly rewritten (by you) between the my CSD request and your comment here. At the time of my first posting the copyvio, it did exist. Good that it's been removed though... – moonty (talk) (contribs) 04:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Ed Dobson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply