Talk:Eddie Gray (footballer, born 1948)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 21 March 2021
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 21 March 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 23:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Eddie Gray (footballer, born 1948) → Eddie Gray – clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This article accounts for around 97% of page views for people named Eddie Gray. He also has far more long-term significance than any other Eddie Gray. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 13:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 02:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 12:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - pageviews do not make a primary topic, see WP:PPT. Far too many people called Edward/Eddie Gray to merit having a primary topic. GiantSnowman 12:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- @GiantSnowman: I reject the suggestion that there are too many people with the same name to make this a primary topic. Would you supprt moving David Cameron or Henry Ford or even John Barnes because there are too many other people who share their names. Equally, he wasn't an Edward so there are only 3 or 4 other articles this could apply to anyway, with this Eddie Gray receiving the vast amount of coverage in reliable sources. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- I opposed the John Barnes move and still think that was a silly decision. GiantSnowman 21:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I respect your opinion. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- I opposed the John Barnes move and still think that was a silly decision. GiantSnowman 21:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- @GiantSnowman: I reject the suggestion that there are too many people with the same name to make this a primary topic. Would you supprt moving David Cameron or Henry Ford or even John Barnes because there are too many other people who share their names. Equally, he wasn't an Edward so there are only 3 or 4 other articles this could apply to anyway, with this Eddie Gray receiving the vast amount of coverage in reliable sources. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I feel disambiguation is there for a reason. I agree with GS points. Makes more sense to me anyway. Govvy (talk) 11:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.