Talk:Eden, Wisconsin

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 1 March 2017
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Eden, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 1 March 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: one moved, one not. Strong consensus on the move of the town, rough consensus not to move the village. Andrewa (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


– The current titles are unsustainable, they're ambiguous with each other. This seems to be the standard way to dab US villages with towns of the same place, which I agree looks weird. Open to other suggestions if there is something cleaner. Jenks24 (talk) 12:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Support moves to avoid ambiguity.  ONR  (talk)  20:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep the village at its current title, and move the town to Eden (town), Fond du lac County, Wisconsin. Despite their different naming convention, Wisconsin towns are generally equivalent to civil townships in other states. When a village and a town share the same name, especially when the town and village are neighbors, the village is essentially always the primary target (and what people think of when they refer to "Eden, Wisconsin"). As for the town's article, Eden (town), Wisconsin is ambiguous with Eden, Iowa County, Wisconsin, which is also a town, so we'll probably have to do what you proposed for Monroe. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 01:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • I agree with The Catalyst31 about keeping the title for the village of Eden and changing the title for the town of Eden in Fond du Lac County. There is also a town named Eden in Iowa County, Wisconsin; the town of Eden in Fond du Lac County should keep Fond du Lac County within its title to avoid confusion with the town of Eden in Iowa County. Thank you-RFD (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.