This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
1. There is significant copy/pasting and close paraphrasing of the sources throughout the article.
2. The accuracy of the claims of the edict's effects is very questionable. I haven't checked the other sources, but the JSS article actually notes that the edict actually had practically no effect on the missionaries' activities. Also, it was only pushed by one government official while the King was actually indifferent to the issue, which directly contradicts what Willuconquer previously added to the Thai Sa article. And the claimed link to later events that happened after the fall of Ayutthaya is also doubtful, as knowledge of the edict's existence seems to have been lost by then. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
